![]() |
Quote:
:rofl: |
Quote:
anyway - ha ha. if the 90 > 60 then why is GM dropping the 90* in favor of a whole new lineup of 60 motors to put in all their cars, called the "high value lineup"? ;) anyway - everyone can think what they want. my 3.4 will pwn all. lol |
Quote:
Now on a second note. I put this post up to record the progress of the build and for anyone who is interested to ask questions. NOT to hear BS from certain V8 guys who have the constant need to reasure them selves of there manhood. PS: exuse the grammar/spelling...its 5:37am |
Quote:
|
Quote:
- Justin |
Quote:
- Justin |
Didn't Ben (RallyRed98 ) come between there somewhere?
|
Quote:
- Justin |
Quote:
|
Quote:
- Justin |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
What F-body do drive again....I mean currently as in if you just go out side and get in something
|
Quote:
|
down hill......thats not the point....i didn't start this tread to have to f'n arrgue with you jackazzes about what i'm doing
|
you asked him what he can get in, your cars further from running than his
|
.....not really....but your still pushing a mute point......you want to knock my project start your own god damn thread
|
and we all can't forget the single turbo(off only one bank)3.1 3rd gen that ran 12s... never saw the slip but if it was said on the internet it must be true.
|
Quote:
|
well I can put a number to it until its done but i'm hopping it'll see 260-290rwtrq which is about 300-340ft/lb at the flywheel...doubt it but its a goal
|
bubba i kno what u feel man, happened to me up here all the time, ppl would flame me cuz i had a 305 tbi turd-gen. i had some kid saying he would put for lenghts on me in his 93 z28. well when we did finally race he had me by one car length. i was figuring either he cant drive or his car is ****ed up so we swapped cars and sure as ****, his car beat my car by one length. but that aint the point, let them flame, when it comes time, either u will have it or u wont. right now, im fixing on destroying a 05 chevy 1500 with the 5.3L and a blowmaster 50 series
|
Quote:
and yes, bubba's right - my ECM (stock GM tune) hates the jump in compression (9:1 -> 9.5:1) and the fact that i have a larger than stock cam. fyi - there are two reported 400 hp 2.8L N/A motors currently existing in the world, they are both in boats however. but the point is that it can be done N/A -- just how you build it. definitely would like to know how they built those motors lol. :-p edit: before the cam, but after the topend swap i did (before the 184rwhp/212rwtq...should have dyno'd then too)... i have to date held off a stock 1996 Z28 Convertible. I was showing off for him cause he was interested in what my car could do - cause it sounds amazing "for a v6" as he put it... i did a clutch drop at a stoplight - 5k and floored it (i have a T5..so its respectable, 3.4L cars + autos = t3h suck, imo) and i did a nice little burnout and launches and took off and powershifted (hammered) from 1-4th gear. i pulled around the corner and into a parking lot and when he finally caught up and stopped he was like "omfg - what did you do to that thing???" i replied with "what do you mean?" to which he said "I was flooring my car and I couldnt catch up to you... once you took off i did the same and i started gaining on you but i got like a few car lengths and then suddenly i couldnt close the gap anymore...what have you done to this beast??" true story - stock 1996 Z28 Convertible - Auto. with between 170rwhp and 184rwhp and between 207 and 212rwtq. anyhow -- i've digressed. wheres the pics bubba? |
Megasqurit FTW.....If that SOB ever sends it
|
Quote:
- Justin |
Quote:
Oh yeah, you guys have so many cars in the 9s that I lost count... how many are there again? ;) |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.