NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds

NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/index.php)
-   Lounge (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Young drivers kill each other a lot.... (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/showthread.php?t=43225)

Frosty 04-22-2009 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BonzoHansen (Post 578781)
Frosty I agree the driving test is near-useless. I'd be all for making is much harder, I'm just not sure how to pay for it.

Yup, the age-old problem. You know Bonzo, I was still thinking about this law a little while ago....I don't know all of the statistics off the top of my head and I'm too lazy to look them up but what will having an 11PM curfew do to reduce the number of accidents? Do the statistics prove that 11PM is the magic number when looking at the time of the accidents?

Mike 04-22-2009 08:52 PM

you should have to be able to spell RECKLESS to have a license

BonzoHansen 04-22-2009 08:54 PM

I think that has a lot to do with sleeping & driving. I'm willing to bet the stats hold water on the timing.

NJ346 04-22-2009 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbrrmike (Post 579017)
you should have to be able to spell RECKLESS to have a license

haha...maybe that would stop all of the foreigners from be able to get licenses.

Frosty 04-22-2009 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJNETSFAN (Post 579028)
haha...maybe that would stop all of the foreigners from be able to get licenses.

...just foreigners? Try half of the general population lol

Mike 04-22-2009 09:16 PM

would have stopped you too.......

LTb1ow 04-22-2009 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BonzoHansen (Post 579018)
I think that has a lot to do with sleeping & driving. I'm willing to bet the stats hold water on the timing.

And there should be no reason for a minor to be out driving past 11. No reason.

Mike 04-22-2009 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shownomercy (Post 579031)
And there should be no reason for a minor to be out driving past 11. No reason.

work

LTb1ow 04-22-2009 09:18 PM

A 17 year old, working past 11?

BonzoHansen 04-22-2009 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbrrmike (Post 579032)
work

:werd: I worked past 11pm a bunch. Now, I believe the previous version of this law had an exclusion for driving to/from work off hours. Does that still exist?

Mike 04-22-2009 09:20 PM

busing/waiting tables, working retail during the holidays.

lots of jobs

NJ346 04-22-2009 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbrrmike (Post 579030)
would have stopped you too.......

I know, but that wasn't my point....

91chevywt 04-22-2009 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L695speed (Post 578825)
Well the biggest problem is people need to learn how to drive at some point. I don't see how raising the driving age, to the point where people are working and going to college is going to help that. It might just make things worse. What we need is a system like Germany......one of the hardest tests in the world.

This is exactly the point. A bad driver will be a bad driver whether they are 16 or 25. They need to enforce a more strict test along with more education. The 3 months of driver's ed isn't enough. Bad driving is caused more by ignorance than anything...the only way to get rid of ignorance is through education. Pushing back the age and enforcing new fines only establishes a little extra income and pissed off young drivers if anything. There should be more of a requirement for drivers education, at the drivers cost not the states, in order to obtain a license. You want to drive you need to do the work.

NastyEllEssWon 04-22-2009 09:49 PM

everyone is missing the big picture.



the reason they have the law that you can only have so many passengers in their car is to cut down on the number of multiple teen fatalities. studies have shown that with more passengers the rate for distractions go up. i can concur these studies from my own memories. haha i remember some really bad driving taking place back in the day.

L695speed 04-22-2009 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NastyEllEssWon (Post 579066)
i can concur these studies from my own memories. haha i remember some really bad driving taking place back in the day.

Well I know I sped, took a couple corners like it were a track, but it was well within reason. The worst thing I did was me and a bunch of friends (yea we all had GDLs but I was allowed to take more than one friend as I passed the age limit) had a craving for the cheesecake factory....so off we went down the parkway. Now my car had a broken speedo the wrong way, I looked down and mine was pegged past 90. in that car 90 was well over 100 mph. It was a miricle we didn't get tickets that day. The only time I was ever pulled over was in the wee hours of the morning heading home from the beach "riding the yellow line" please.... anyway, back to my point...bad driving is only improved by experience, the laws are NOT helping that factor...afterall, all of our parents survived that back in the day. So why are we being forced to do all this crap that really doesn't help?

BonzoHansen 04-22-2009 10:21 PM

There are twice as many cars on the road now. Cars are faster now. You cannot compare conditions now to 30 years ago.

Frosty 04-22-2009 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbrrmike (Post 579030)
would have stopped you too.......

If that was directed towards me...did I mess up the spelling too? :doh: I do that a lot lol

LTb1ow 04-22-2009 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BonzoHansen (Post 579110)
There are twice as many cars on the road now. Cars are faster now. You cannot compare conditions now to 30 years ago.

I would bet kids are stupider(sp?) nowadays too.

Dilley 04-22-2009 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbrrmike (Post 579017)
you should have to be able to spell RECKLESS to have a license

i deserved that one

Mike 04-22-2009 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 579111)
If that was directed towards me...did I mess up the spelling too? :doh: I do that a lot lol

i didn't notice if you did, but two people in a row did and they each spelled it differently

NJ346 04-22-2009 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbrrmike (Post 579117)
i didn't notice if you did, but two people in a row did and they each spelled it differently

well my original post that had "wreckless" in it was made from a cellphone so I have a partial excuse. My friend also calls himself wreckless ws6 so i assumed that it was spelled that way, guess I was wrong..

Frosty 04-23-2009 02:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbrrmike (Post 579117)
i didn't notice if you did, but two people in a row did and they each spelled it differently

Oh ok, I thought you were busting my balls again, lol.

ar0ck 04-23-2009 09:04 AM

Read today in The Record, they are planning on putting stickers on people ages 16-21 with Provisional Licenses.

91chevywt 04-23-2009 09:06 AM

Nice. I'm sure it'll change the statistics. But there will still be the same amount of idiot drivers out there.

sweetbmxrider 04-23-2009 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbrrmike (Post 579017)
you should have to be able to spell RECKLESS to have a license

its funny because i have seen wreckless on traffic tickets :lol:

Quote:

Originally Posted by ar0ck (Post 579205)
Read today in The Record, they are planning on putting stickers on people ages 16-21 with Provisional Licesnes.

i guess this might work. its like the proactive vs reactive types of punishment. there should be a dedicated number so you can report aggressive driving by minors only. let the people police themselves kind of thing.

oh ya, i think its 7 out of 10 cars have a driving who has consumed alcohol when driving after 10 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.