View Single Post
Old 12-19-2007, 03:38 PM   #56
Tru2Chevy
Co-Founder / Site Admin
 
Tru2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,476
iTrader: (8)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonmouthCtyAntz View Post
I dont agree w/ any of that. The newer 350z's run 13.2's-13.5@105.xx-107.xx w/ anywhere from 1.9-2.2 short times bone stock , if thats not LS1 times then im not sure what is. I have owned 4 4th gen fbods and have driven in a few newer GT's and the ride was not only quieter but much smoother. The average american buyer could careless about horsepower differance's which is one big reason why the stang is still around and the fbody isnt. As soon as the electonic nanny is taken care of on the 3V GT's they run pretty evenly w/ most LS1's. Its also kinda lame to be comming out w/ a 400 hp fbod in 2009-10 when you can get that in a 2005 GTO.
To use your own argument against you.....yea, LS1s ran those times - 10 years ago.

As for the comment about a 400hp F-body, well, maybe I just missed the big news, but when did GM announce what engines will be available in the Camaro as well as the hp numbers that they will be making?

Oh that's right, they didn't....so your comment is based on nothing but speculation.

- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?

Tru2Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote