Thread: Dodge Avenger
View Single Post
Old 04-30-2008, 11:54 AM   #35
12secondv6
Token v6 Guy
 
12secondv6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: No longer neon land :(
Posts: 5,703
iTrader: (6)
When there were spy shots of the dodge avenger I was strongly considering it.... I LOVE the styling, interior wasn't half bad, power plant seemed fine to me. The only thing that might stop me from buying one is because I can get a Benz for the same price If I could not, then I would get one.




My experience with dodge.....

2004 dodge neon.
Best of 38 mpg
Worst of 26 mpg

Nothing broke in the 30,000-35,000 miles I had it.

I was VERY happy with it.... I had ZERO complaints about it. Sure it was a relativerly cheap interior..... but it ALWAYS cleaned up nice and VERY durable and it cost me $12,100!


My experience with GM.....

1997 Pontiac Firebird
1996 Pontiac Trans Am
1972 Chevy Chevelle

Both Pontiac's have had wiper issues, window issues, pop up headlight issues, rattling/ cheap interior issues.

Chevelle - very few things could go wrong on it

My experience with Mercury....
1991 Mercurcy Topaz
1992? Mercury Sable

Cheap cars.... topaz had the rear drum brake explode twice.... the internal parts shot through the brake drum.... sable had the brakes fail on me... F that, I want working brakes.

My experience with Hyundai
2002 Hyundai Elantra

Wife's car..... factoring the "slight" lack of maintenance before I was in the picture, I am damn impressed. Sure it is an inexpensive car... GREAT gas mileage (34 mpg)... minor problems but still going at 130,000 miles

My experience with Mercedes-Benz
2003 C230 coupe
2006 E350
2007 E350
2007 SLK280

Flawless cars... each one gave better fuel economy than advertised... best of 35 mpg in the E350... they were PUT THROUGH HELL and survived all nightmares. I will continue with the benz's
__________________
2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8 - 12.079 at 116.45
2010 Ford Taurus SHO - stage 4+ tune and an intake - no times yet
12secondv6 is offline   Reply With Quote