View Single Post
Old 05-18-2008, 04:38 PM   #25
Tru2Chevy
Co-Founder / Site Admin
 
Tru2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,476
iTrader: (8)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
Looking from a shop owners viewpoint, my guess is a shop can't make enough money to warrant the potential risks involved.

A decent shop would likely insist on new GM parts, at least key parts like the weatherstipping ($500+? and the shop only makes like 10% on that). Then add what would be likely a minimum of 10-12 hours labor ($1200+? there is no book time to reference for this) plus paint ($1000? time & materials) I might guess a minimum customer cost would be in the area of $3000. Of which the shop might make $500 after costs & overhead.

Now, if they leak then that shop will never get that car out of their bays - it'll just keep coming back wasting hours of their time. The paying customer won't want to hear the OE ones leak too. Chasing a water leak can take hours. And I am not even getting into the potential liability of altering the structure of a car.

So no, it is not kinda gayy a shop wouldn't do it. I imagine if Paul or Josh saw this they might tend to agree. Sure it could all go easy & well and everybody is happy. But the potential downside is probably too much for a shop to want to take on, especially if this is a one time deal and not something they do on a regular basis.
No need for paint, and you aren't altering the structure......but the water leak potential alone would prolly keep a shop away.

- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?

Tru2Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote