opinions on this...?
So i met this guy today to trade my 95 v6 camaro for his 94 jeep cherokee. we met up and talked about both cars and everything titles in head. decided to do the trade straight up. now i looked his truck over real good and took it for a spin before buying it, he decided it wasn't necessary to drive my camaro before making the trade. he seemed like he wanted it no matter what was wrong. anyway we signed the titles and left i went home in the jeep and he took my camaro. i get home, and about a half hour later he calls me and says that he's broken down on the side of 295, he has a flat that the car started smoking real bad and he discovered there was no trans fluid in it. I'm thinking this is ridiculous, i NEVER had a problem with the trans, fluid was ALWAYS on the stick and i flushed in multiple times in it's life. anyway he seems to think the trans is gernaded now and he says if it is "we need to talk". now my question... do i have any legal responsibility to reverse the trade? my dad says after the titles are signed it's out of my control. I'm leaning towards that but just wondering what you guys think.
__________________
02 F250 7.3
96 F250 351
96 z28 borla cat back k&n cold air and a 3 inch cowl
FOR SALEpm for details
03 vw 20th anninversary gti
4 33x10.50 15 procomp xterrains
|