View Single Post
Old 01-16-2009, 08:34 PM   #52
foff667
Keyboard Tough Guy
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Trenton, NJ
Posts: 6,341
iTrader: (0)
I agree with most of what Tim has said...I don't think the kids should've been taken away on their names alone. The names are just dumb and show how idiotic their parent are. Once the kid is old enough to get a job he'll be old enough to realize he can change his name and hopefully he can think for himself at that time and do so if he's unhappy.

Yes its fu*&ed up that his parents named their kids what they did. Is the kid suffering because shoprite wouldn't write his name on the cake, not really. Should they have made a stink about it? Probably not but this just shows their stupidity. Should the state have taken their kids away from them? No. Unless it comes out they were starving them or beating them or something really nuts which I doubt they are.

I'm not going to get into it any further than that, but I don't think kids should be taken away from their parents unless there is physical &/or serious mental abuse involved. If they love their kids & aren't abusing them let it lie.

BTW im sure at some point in time people feared the name Alexander...think "The Great", I'm pretty sure he & his army killed 10's of thousands during his rein.

Just my .02
foff667 is offline   Reply With Quote