NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds - View Single Post

Formulalt1 · 04-29-2009, 07:40 PM

OK, so it looks like everyone is around 3600 (give or take a hundred). I think the problem is the design of the TCC/program in relation to a stock converter, then adding in a converter that isn't as tight. I think if you guys need a minium of 1600RPMS or slightly higher in RPM's for this problem not to happen. Since you all have different gears and I believe the program asks for MPH ( I am not positive about this though, I would have to look again.) some calculation might have to happen but what it sounds like is happening is that while the purpose of a TCC circiut is to stop slipping and the whole point of a performance converter is to slip and that the engine and tranny aren't spinning at the same speed when engagement is suppose to take place, so like a manual car getting the clutch jerked too quickly the car bucks/stumbles a little.

04-29-2009, 07:40 PM	#24
Formulalt1 Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Lakewood Posts: 452 iTrader: (3)	OK, so it looks like everyone is around 3600 (give or take a hundred). I think the problem is the design of the TCC/program in relation to a stock converter, then adding in a converter that isn't as tight. I think if you guys need a minium of 1600RPMS or slightly higher in RPM's for this problem not to happen. Since you all have different gears and I believe the program asks for MPH ( I am not positive about this though, I would have to look again.) some calculation might have to happen but what it sounds like is happening is that while the purpose of a TCC circiut is to stop slipping and the whole point of a performance converter is to slip and that the engine and tranny aren't spinning at the same speed when engagement is suppose to take place, so like a manual car getting the clutch jerked too quickly the car bucks/stumbles a little. __________________ Last edited by Formulalt1; 04-29-2009 at 08:03 PM.