View Single Post
Old 05-16-2009, 10:18 PM   #22
BigAls87Z28
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NastyEllEssWon View Post
your logic makes no sense al. how do you get that the challenger is deffinately bigger than the camaro when theyre not even in the same pics....maybe a thirdgen but goddamn the new camaro dwarfs them too.

fail
Funny you say that..







I dont remember every talking about the Challenger's size in this thread, outside of comparing my third gen to the Challenger that was gassing up in front of me.


Quote:
Originally Posted by NastyEllEssWon View Post
me either. i hate the new camaro. the challenger at least looks like its supposed to...an old HEAVY car. the new camaro just fails on every level...


ESPECIALLY THE CHEAP AND PLASTIC LOOKING category. these cars are gonna look like **** in a few years
Challenger was a Pony car, designed ot be lighter then the Charger.
It should have been called Charger coupe. Not Challenger.
Camaro fails on every level? Cause its not heavy? Cause you dont have to pay 40k for 400+hp? Cause you get massive 4 pistion brakes for 30k? Or is it that you can get a 6spd auto or manual in every trim level?
Is it teh 304hp V6 that gets 29mpg? Is that where the fail is?



Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
Hey! I could have said 3rd gens! LOL

Third gens are mostly steel, and still weigh less then the 4th gens, with thier fancy aluminum motors and plastic pannels.
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped
BigAls87Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote