Quote:
Originally Posted by NastyEllEssWon
your logic makes no sense al. how do you get that the challenger is deffinately bigger than the camaro when theyre not even in the same pics....maybe a thirdgen but goddamn the new camaro dwarfs them too.
fail
|
Funny you say that..
I dont remember every talking about the Challenger's size in this thread, outside of comparing my third gen to the Challenger that was gassing up in front of me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NastyEllEssWon
me either. i hate the new camaro. the challenger at least looks like its supposed to...an old HEAVY car. the new camaro just fails on every level...
ESPECIALLY THE CHEAP AND PLASTIC LOOKING category. these cars are gonna look like **** in a few years
|
Challenger was a Pony car, designed ot be lighter then the Charger.
It should have been called Charger coupe. Not Challenger.
Camaro fails on every level? Cause its not heavy? Cause you dont have to pay 40k for 400+hp? Cause you get massive 4 pistion brakes for 30k? Or is it that you can get a 6spd auto or manual in every trim level?
Is it teh 304hp V6 that gets 29mpg? Is that where the fail is?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen
Hey! I could have said 3rd gens! LOL
|
Third gens are mostly steel, and still weigh less then the 4th gens, with thier fancy aluminum motors and plastic pannels.