[BonzoHansen]

Argh, this may be the dumbest thread in the past 6 months! I just saw 6 pages and decided to read it. What a load of numbnuts we have here. There is so much stupid in this thread I had to take notes.

Different strokes for different folks, well said.

There is nothing wrong with liking/owning/talking about other makes/models of cars. There are some Mustangs that are better than Camaros. The new mustang holds a nice weight advantage over the SUV-tire clad and bloated Camaro. Get over it. It is also ok to not like other makes/models of cars. The new Mustang is ugly, especially the back of it. The new SUV-tire clad and bloated Camaro looks nicer to me.

One exception. Anyone that thinks a late model mustang looks better than a 1969 COPO Camaro should be banned for being a total idiot and have his eyes checked.

New guy: Really? Gerbil jokes? Good lord. And the big font, please.

Al: There was a Z28 in 1974 as well as 1977. Also **** you late 2nd gens are great. Go buy some fender flares for that 3rd gen you got.

Tsar: Yes, Melissa calls you Vitals too.

NastyLS1: Live axles are as ancient as leaf springs. However both can be quite effective. And judging by the track record of live axles in 3rd & 4th gens your argument is terrible at best. Also, you should never argue automotive history, you are wrong probably 99% of the time. One more thing, a bennie cannot call another person a bennie. If you live in Hamilton you are no less a bennie/shoobie than someone from Philly or Bergen. Dumbass.

Kasey: FTW

Now, getting back on topic, the pictures in the 1st post are stupid. Whoever had that idea should be banned from thinking ever again.