View Single Post
Old 01-15-2015, 06:56 AM   #19
Paul Huryk
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Bridgewater, NJ
Posts: 835
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28 View Post
The GT is about flexing Ford's engineering and design prowess. It is not stuffing the biggest engine they have, slapping some turbos on it, and calling it a day. This is not a retro throwback. This is Ford's technological showcase.
Then they failed already. Their showcase is one of getting 80% there, not 100% as one with expect with their supercar.

Considering they had to engineer the body, chassis, suspension, and drivetrain (other than the engine), why would they use a pedestrian V6, even one tuned to 600hp? If it was an option for a lower tier model (out of two), it would make sense - but for a car that is probably going to crest $200k, not a great choice.

Acura learned with the original NSX how a subpar engine can kill a great car (over time) - the first few years the car sold well with the 3.0L motor, then competitors started matching or exceeding the power level. By the time they discontinued the car in 2003 it was underpowered with the 290hp 3.2L and you have to put forced induction to get any real power gains.
__________________
1984 Camaro: 350 Auto, Global West Suspension, Baer Brakes, CTW Wheels
1989 GTA: Bolt-on L98. Global West Suspension, full Magnaflow exhaust, Wilwood Brakes, CTW Wheels
Paul Huryk is offline   Reply With Quote