Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Bishop
Er, Ram trucks? Any Chrysler? They're still 3/36-5/100.
|
I'd rather a ford or gm product over a chrysler product, always. I also don't see the desire for such a long warranty. Most major issues are going to show up well before 50k miles and would be apparent on a large scale, not just 1 car, thus issuing a recall. Cars are designed and built to last around the 100k mark, and then, they start needing moderate to major repairs. Hell, spark plugs last 100k+. Stick to the routine maintenance and there isn't going to be an issue with the vehicle unless you abuse it or use it outside its designed purpose.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1320B4U
Why would I want to pay for something that was free at 1 point. Was at the dealer today, new Tahoe 68k...average auto loan is 6years now. Depending on driving habits (my wife at 25k year) the warranty would be off in a little over 2 years. Not that I'm in the market for a new car at this point but having a 100k p/train is somewhat nice (esp since her '11 has another 10k left on it). 100k was nice, it showed confidence in a brand that was back by the gov't at one point. the offering showed the emergence of a 're-organized' better managed car company. Its like getting paid 100k a year then the next year they lower your salary to 60k...folks be like wtf...problems?
|
Compare your current tahoe against your past tahoe and note all the differences as well as economical impact causing your jump in price. That is seen in everything in the world today. Now add in your "free" warranty that was built into the price of the vehicle and I'm not exactly sure what you are trying to say.