View Single Post
Old 10-09-2004, 11:05 AM   #8
Fastbird
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sicklerville, NJ/McGuire AFB
Posts: 457
iTrader: (0)
Those numbers aren't that bad. Let's use a conservative Mustang to Dynojet comparison of -15% for the mustang dyno from the dynojet numbers.

254 / .85 = 298
274 / .85 = 322

Those are comparable to stock LS1 numbers, and the mustang is rated at 300 and ??? for TQ, so I'd say those are actually pretty good.
__________________

Active Duty USAF KC-10 Boom Operator
Speed Density LT1 Forum -- 93 Service Manual DTC\'s and Diagnostic Charts
Fastbird is offline   Reply With Quote