Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by foff667
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28
The Z28, as well as the other "Z" cars are based off an RPO code. Z71 is an offroad package, Z34 gave you the DOHC 3.4 V6, and the Z24 was the 2.4 Quad 4 "hi-po" cavi.
Does the SVT badge belong on a Focus? How about an F150?
Its not just slapping on badges...there is a bit more then just two little letters on the fenders this time around.
|
unfortunatly they rarely use it correctly...the 03+ cobras use it well, as well as the 99+ lightnings...the prototype turboed, intercooled svt focus wouldve been nice  and your talking about their special vehicles division name vs. a Z in front of every turd car they can think of...next it will be the Zventure or the Zcentury putting a Z and an extra cam in a car to make 10 more hp over the base model isnt doing it for me. Putting a 300hp ls1 into a camaro Z28 over a base mode 6 that makes 180 to the wheels is what the **** im talkin bout |
Well, first off the Venture and Centry no longer exist...well, after this year.
2nd, the intergration of FWD cars kinda hurts the "performance" aspect of cars. This isnt the 60's.
I think outside of the SS Silvy, all cars that have the SS badge are well deserving of it. |
I've agreed with you so far in this thread but are you sure that the late Monte Carlo SSs desserve it?
I would think that the SS badge on one of those would mean even more due to the monte being the NASCAR dads' type of car......maybe a v8 or something, but just recently they got a supercharger right?
__________________
- Fran
Black 97 Z/28 M6
CMotorsports 383 LT1, Jet hot LTs, mufflex 4\", spec3 clutch, 233/239 112, bla, bla, bla...
Stock suspension and rear for now.
Daily driver- '04 Sub Forrester 2.5XT
|