Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fasterthanyou
Keep believing everything the libral media sources tells you  . Bluffing my ass, again, even if that were true it's still Saddam that was the instigator. Why do you keep wanting to blaim Bush for things nobody else could have predicted. Remember, Kerry ALSO wanted to go in. Or wait, didn't he also say he wouldn't have given the hind sight... yeah, wouldn't we ALL like to have 100% accurate inteligence and in Kerry's case, foreshadowing abilities, lol.
You make it out as if the media is where Bush gets his inteligence from. PLEASE tell me you don't believe everything you read. Agendias are everywhere, I just think that Bush wasn't going to war because of his. It wasn't JUST Bush that wanted to go into Iraq mind you, it was everybody (democrats included). It just so happened that Bush had to make the final say.
Would I be wrong to assume you believe the 9/11 attack was Bush's fault and not Clintons or hey, maybe Osama himself? |
hey, i don't like the democratic party, i consider myself a republican if anything. that doesn't mean bush isn't an idiot, or doesn't have an agenda. give me a break.
and i don't believe everything i hear in the media. i did believe the president and colin powell when they told us that they had irrefutible evidence that saddam had weapons. well, if they had it then, and the war is over, WHERE IS THAT EVIDENCE NOW?
you know what else i believe, that we went to war to disarm saddam. that's what the president told us last march, when the war started. the message was clear: saddam has weapons, he WILL use them, and we have to stop him before they get in the wrong hands. i agree with that 100%. except, when we went in there, did we find any weapons? NO. in fact, a recent report, plus an interview in TIME with one of saddam's advisors, shows that saddam did not have weapons, he disarmed 10 years ago just like the UN wanted.
so what does our president do? instead of saying,
"we all made a mistake, saddam didn't have weapons, but it's a good thing we got rid of him anyway, he was a bad guy. now let's ask the world for help rebuilding a country that could become a key ally"
we get
"our reason for going to war was justified, the people in iraq were in trouble, and now they are free, and iraq will become a democracy because we fight for democracy."
he changed his rationalization for going to war in the first place. he forgot all about the evidence that clearly showed that saddam had weapons.
i'd rather have a man that can admit when he's made a mistake run our country than a stubborn guy who won't admit when he's wrong. and that's why other countries hate us. not because we make mistakes, it's because we can't admit when we made one.
i'm not an idiot, i don't just believe it because it's on tv...