Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Brake, Chassis and Suspension Tech

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-24-2014, 08:50 PM   #1
V
Stalker
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,078
iTrader: (12)
Tubular K member worth it?

How necessary /useful is a tubular k member really?

The car it would be for is NOT a race car, nor a real street/strip car.
It'll be a show car and cruiser with rare trips to a track(maybe 1-2 times a year if that).

I was first considering it merely due to the ease of install, added room, and such. But once installed its not a part that I will be taking full advantage of.

By using the stock k-member with minor mods, I could save $400+.
I've been reading about fitment issues, problems using stock front control arms(which I will be), and possible cracking with street use.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2014, 08:58 PM   #2
LTb1ow
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
 
LTb1ow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,900
iTrader: (8)
Mine makes my life real easy with fitting stuff, however it def leaves your oil pan exposed.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil View Post
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
LTb1ow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2014, 09:13 PM   #3
PolarBear
Ebearnezer Scrooge/Power Member/Lips
 
PolarBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hamilton, Mercer county
Posts: 4,141
iTrader: (16)
My opinion for a "true" street car, it isn't worth it. Spend the money and put an alarm in it
PolarBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2014, 09:29 PM   #4
V
Stalker
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,078
iTrader: (12)
if I use the stock one, I have to notch for the A/C and "clearance" for the oil pan.
The a/c notch is fine, but the room for the oil pan worries me, its tight. I may just have a good welder mod the back end by like an inch.

The only good tubular brand I've come across in my research is the BMR unit BUT you need to use their tubular A-arms too that that's a big extra expense($500) At that point, a bmr setup would cost more than the car did in the first place.

Last edited by V; 03-24-2014 at 09:29 PM.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2014, 09:51 PM   #5
Jersey Mike
Power Member/NJFBOA Bookie/Moderator
 
Jersey Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Jersey = Best Jersey.
Posts: 4,435
iTrader: (12)
Social Networks:

Keep it factory and have an additional set of keys cut?
__________________

1995 Firebird... Stock-ish.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow View Post
Good. He microwaved my phone 6 years ago, i hope his intake erupts.
Jersey Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2014, 10:14 PM   #6
PolarBear
Ebearnezer Scrooge/Power Member/Lips
 
PolarBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hamilton, Mercer county
Posts: 4,141
iTrader: (16)
Quote:
Originally Posted by V View Post
if I use the stock one, I have to notch for the A/C and "clearance" for the oil pan.
The a/c notch is fine, but the room for the oil pan worries me, its tight. I may just have a good welder mod the back end by like an inch.
If you're cutting/welding for the AC, how much more is the notch really? not much more work. If you WANT to spend money, get the Holley pan, plenty of room for the pan AND you can do a stock style 3rd gen Y pipe, which is what I was planning on doing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jersey Mike View Post
Keep it factory and have an additional set of keys cut?
PolarBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 01:00 AM   #7
Dudbird113
 
Dudbird113's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Millstone, NJ
Posts: 641
iTrader: (0)
I love mine, so much more room to get to stuff.
__________________
94 TA GT. Stock 350, cam, exhaust
Dudbird113 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 01:16 AM   #8
coolmanvette75
12 Second Club / Bullwinkle
 
coolmanvette75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Old Bridge, NJ/Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 1,847
iTrader: (11)
I really love mine. First time I had to work on the car on my back I was amazed at how much easier it actually was to do stuff...
__________________
1994 Medium Patriot Red Z28 6spd
370ci/Huron Speed T6 S480 ET-R HO
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jersey Mike View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by WSex View Post
who is FFB?
An NJFBOA legend. Ask about him at the next meet.
coolmanvette75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 07:13 AM   #9
LTb1ow
Mongo the Meet Coordinator
 
LTb1ow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16,900
iTrader: (8)
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolmanvette75 View Post
I really love mine. First time someone else had to work on the car on their back I was amazed at how much easier it actually was to do stuff...
Fixed.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkEvil View Post
repo bigals turd gen and part it out to a loving home
LTb1ow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 08:15 AM   #10
sweetbmxrider
Meet Coordinator
 
sweetbmxrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: brick/pt. pleasant beach
Posts: 19,342
iTrader: (12)
I like mine but its a 4th gen and it fit. It opens up sooo much room. I haven't had an issue street driving mine but the corners have gussets welded to them. If the holley pan clears, that sounds like a better option.
__________________
sweetbmxrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 08:45 AM   #11
Blackbirdws6
Lord of the rings / 10 Second Club / Meet Coordinator
 
Blackbirdws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Millstone Township, NJ
Posts: 6,361
iTrader: (3)
Looking at mine on jack stands is nice but we will see how it does on the road. There is definitely some more room to work which is a big plus since I typically can't fit myself anywhere. I purchased the road race version due to some of the concerns you mentioned. We will see how it does.
__________________

97 T/A Ram Air Convt
Forever dyno queen / 777rwhp 662 rwtq @ 17lbs / 10.2 @ 140

'24 Corvette Z06
17 Sierra 2500HD Dmax
81 Turbo TA
Blackbirdws6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 01:11 PM   #12
V
Stalker
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,078
iTrader: (12)
Im gonna go about just modding the stock one. It'll be a cruiser/toy more than anything. the ls1 and hatch are already decent weight reduction. If I decide to build the motor more in a few years, i can swap to a tubular one then. I just need to look into how swap longtubes fit with the stock k. Im not supercharged or turbo so the extra room really helps me little.

ill change all the front end bushings when its all apart and paint everything nice.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 07:59 PM   #13
chknhwk01
What?
 
chknhwk01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 411
iTrader: (0)
Talking I have no problemmmm,with mine...

TRACK OR STREET,I HAVE A "SPOHN" ON ITS GREAT, LOTS OF ROOM NO ISHUUUUUUUU,WITH OIL PANS...
__________________
YELLOW BULLET,WHER THE ''WEAK ARE EATEN''
STOP THE ''BITCH IN,BAAAAD
BOOTS TO ASSSES, IF U CAN SMELLLLLLLLLLLLL,WHAT THUNDER IS-SPAYYYY-IN.... RIP, MIKE ROMEO..TUNE,BY DALE CHERRY,INJECTION-CONNECTION..""SHAZAMMMM""
THE FAMOUS ONE215-675-8515 ,AND STEVE SPOHN,and j&g-transmisstions,willow grove,pa,215-659-3022,, R.I.P.JOE PRINCE..
chknhwk01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 08:26 PM   #14
V
Stalker
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,078
iTrader: (12)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chknhwk01 View Post
TRACK OR STREET,I HAVE A "SPOHN" ON ITS GREAT, LOTS OF ROOM NO ISHUUUUUUUU,WITH OIL PANS...
its for a third gen first off and second off.. NO
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2014, 09:27 AM   #15
Fast92RS
Power Member
 
Fast92RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 2,415
iTrader: (13)
I had a spohn one with their tubular a arms on my third gen. It was really nice, handled well and was very easy to get the headers installed because of it and just getting to everything was a lot easier.
__________________
2013 Camaro ZL1
https://kraeserepairs.com
Fast92RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2014, 02:28 PM   #16
qwikz28
13 Second Club / Moderator
 
qwikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,692
iTrader: (6)
Social Networks:

I debated it too, Paul. The reason I opted against it was that I couldn't justify spending the coin knowing that I would be constantly worried about it cracking and knowing my oil pan is exposed. Why pay money to worry?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow View Post
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
qwikz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2014, 03:08 PM   #17
Fast92RS
Power Member
 
Fast92RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 2,415
iTrader: (13)
Really there is no more danger to the pan with the tubular k member. The bottom is still exposed with or without it.
__________________
2013 Camaro ZL1
https://kraeserepairs.com

Last edited by Fast92RS; 03-26-2014 at 03:09 PM.
Fast92RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2014, 03:18 PM   #18
V
Stalker
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,078
iTrader: (12)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PolarBear View Post
If you WANT to spend money, get the Holley pan, plenty of room for the pan AND you can do a stock style 3rd gen Y pipe, which is what I was planning on doing.

which pan? the 302 or the 301?

**edit:

I found it, the HOL-302-2. More clearance than the f body one.
Its only $350. I can probably sell the fbody one for 250 or so, so not much out of pocket considering I can leave the k member as it is, and only notch for the A/c.

Last edited by V; 03-26-2014 at 03:38 PM.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2014, 03:51 PM   #19
PolarBear
Ebearnezer Scrooge/Power Member/Lips
 
PolarBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hamilton, Mercer county
Posts: 4,141
iTrader: (16)
Quote:
Originally Posted by V View Post
which pan? the 302 or the 301?

**edit:

I found it, the HOL-302-2. More clearance than the f body one.
Its only $350. I can probably sell the fbody one for 250 or so, so not much out of pocket considering I can leave the k member as it is, and only notch for the A/c.
Both those are slightly different than the pan I bought since Holley bought the design from JZ Motorworks. I have a thread on TGO about the clearance if you really want to know, I'll look later if you want. It's in the LSx board and my user is scooter over there if you want to search.

The only negative I see is that you have less oil capacity than the F-body pan, but you can slightly overfill, or run an accusump if you're running on the track.

I found it
http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/lt...erent-oil.html

Last edited by PolarBear; 03-26-2014 at 04:00 PM.
PolarBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2014, 04:25 PM   #20
WildBillyT
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
 
WildBillyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
iTrader: (10)
I can get you the contact info for a Holley LS swap parts engineer if you need it, too.
WildBillyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2014, 05:13 PM   #21
V
Stalker
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,078
iTrader: (12)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PolarBear View Post
Both those are slightly different than the pan I bought since Holley bought the design from JZ Motorworks. I have a thread on TGO about the clearance if you really want to know, I'll look later if you want. It's in the LSx board and my user is scooter over there if you want to search.

The only negative I see is that you have less oil capacity than the F-body pan, but you can slightly overfill, or run an accusump if you're running on the track.

I found it
http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/lt...erent-oil.html

Yea, I was reading that thread. They were talking about the 302-1 that was just coming out back then. the 302-2 is a diff design and hawks claims 5.7 Qts(6.2 with stock oil filter). http://www.hawksthirdgenparts.com/products/Oil-Pan%2C-GM-LS-Retro%252dfit%2C-1955%252d87-GM%7B47%7DMuscle-Car%7B47%7DClassic-Car%7B47%7DTrucks-Requiring-More-Clearance-Holley-Performance.html

302-1 and 302-2 comparison... http://www.holley.com/data/products/...302-2Comp1.jpg

Holley 302-1




Holley 302-2 (this one is the one I'd get)






and STOCK F-Body pan....





302-2 vs. stock


Last edited by V; 03-26-2014 at 05:27 PM.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2014, 06:13 PM   #22
PolarBear
Ebearnezer Scrooge/Power Member/Lips
 
PolarBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hamilton, Mercer county
Posts: 4,141
iTrader: (16)
Quote:
Originally Posted by V View Post
Yea, I was reading that thread. They were talking about the 302-1 that was just coming out back then. the 302-2 is a diff design and hawks claims 5.7 Qts(6.2 with stock oil filter).
302-2 vs. stock

Mine isnt really the 302-1 as shown on TGO, but it is close.

I haven't seen the 302-2, that's a cool pan, it's like a cross between the 302-1 and the Stock F-body. That looks like a GREAT swap pan for people who don't want to cut up crossmembers and are going to run long tubes. It also probably has a little more clearance in the front area too than the one I have.

Good choice
PolarBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2014, 07:04 PM   #23
omarcamaro
12 Second Club
 
omarcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: clifton nj
Posts: 236
iTrader: (1)
the 302-2 pan is designed for 1st gen f bodies that's the one I'm using in my 67 rs
__________________

67 Camaro RS
70 Camaro RS
95 Camaro Z28
omarcamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2014, 09:44 PM   #24
chknhwk01
What?
 
chknhwk01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 411
iTrader: (0)
Talking Immmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..

I LIKE THE "CANON"PAN.ALUM,ON MY 4TH GEN,,,,
NO ISSSUUUU,AT AWE......
__________________
YELLOW BULLET,WHER THE ''WEAK ARE EATEN''
STOP THE ''BITCH IN,BAAAAD
BOOTS TO ASSSES, IF U CAN SMELLLLLLLLLLLLL,WHAT THUNDER IS-SPAYYYY-IN.... RIP, MIKE ROMEO..TUNE,BY DALE CHERRY,INJECTION-CONNECTION..""SHAZAMMMM""
THE FAMOUS ONE215-675-8515 ,AND STEVE SPOHN,and j&g-transmisstions,willow grove,pa,215-659-3022,, R.I.P.JOE PRINCE..
chknhwk01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2014, 10:32 PM   #25
V
Stalker
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,078
iTrader: (12)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chknhwk01 View Post
I LIKE THE "CANON"PAN.ALUM,ON MY 4TH GEN,,,,
NO ISSSUUUU,AT AWE......
Honestly, I have no idea what a " 'CANON'PAN.ALUM " is nor do I see why its fit on a 4th gen is relevant to me in any way.
You do not own a third generation (1982-1992) camaro or firebird with an LSx swap, so unless you can provide LEGIBLE answers or opinions please refrain from posting in this or any of my threads. If you have applicable information, I will gladly listen and take it into consideration but just please spend some time writing it out properly along with using proper punctuation. With the manner you present yourself, it is impossible for anyone to take you seriously or put any value behind anything you try to say.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Tech Forums > Brake, Chassis and Suspension Tech


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.