|
03-09-2008, 10:48 PM
|
#1
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 929
|
t5 trans
ok so my t5 whines in first and second under load and deccel, neutral its fine. so anyways i was told its probably the bearings or the syncros are shot. but anyways, so its probably needing a rebuilt...now, i was looking in to the world class upgrade. does anyone have any pros/cons on it? and price comparison? Thanks.
__________________
1986 IROC-Z - 305- .030 over, Voodoo cam, 113 vette heads, tpi, hedman torque steps, GMMG 3in catback, custom chip, t56, 3.27s 9 bolt, rest of the car is stock.
2011 Camaro - 2lt/rs red jewel tincoat, m6 - SOLD
2014 Camaro SS - bolt ons
1998 Jimmy - the beater
|
|
|
03-09-2008, 11:17 PM
|
#2
|
Power Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Milford NJ
Posts: 1,526
|
pro, its a bit stronger than a regular t5
con, its still a t5
________
Molli
Last edited by //<86TA>\\; 05-04-2011 at 07:15 PM.
|
|
|
03-11-2008, 12:50 PM
|
#3
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 72
|
What year is it? The wc units started in 88. If it whines it useally is a sign that it has been run low on fluid sometime during it's life.The bearings never really go bad to often in those. The head gears or the maindrive gear and the main driven gear wear because that is where the most heat is. Drain it see how much is in there? You can change with new fluid but the damage is already done probably. It will still whine. Bob
|
|
|
03-11-2008, 05:09 PM
|
#4
|
Power Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 2,415
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by //<86TA>\\
pro, its a bit stronger than a regular t5
con, its still a t5
|
Just curious what makes the T5 in the mustangs better? I know that they where world class units but what else made them stronger than the ones in F-bodies?
|
|
|
03-11-2008, 09:10 PM
|
#5
|
Power Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Milford NJ
Posts: 1,526
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast92RS
Just curious what makes the T5 in the mustangs better? I know that they where world class units but what else made them stronger than the ones in F-bodies?
|
i wasn't aware that they were any stronger
________
New Jersey Marijuana Dispensary
Last edited by //<86TA>\\; 05-04-2011 at 07:16 PM.
|
|
|
03-12-2008, 12:38 AM
|
#6
|
11 second club / Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Berlin, NJ
Posts: 7,148
|
F-body 88+ WCT5 305lbs
Mustang 84(?)-89 WCT5 265lbs
Mustang 90+ WCT5 305lbs
Ford used the Worldclass spec internals first, but did not use stronger gears till 2 years after GM.
Other differences i can think of (other then the obvious clutch and bellhousings) is that the 'stang transmissions don't have tq provisions, 10 spline input shafts, different size out put shafts also. Allthough I could be wrong.
__________________
2001 Trans Am WS6 •SLP Loudmouth II •UMI Suspension •12.857 @ 109.57
1996 Trans Am WS6 •Pacesetter Longtubes •Strange 12 Bolt •Spohn Suspension •11.152 @ 123.85
|
|
|
03-12-2008, 08:24 AM
|
#7
|
Power Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 2,415
|
Ok. A couple friends of mine had mustangs with T5's. One friend had quite a bit of work done and would beat the hell out of it and the trans would keap going. Thats why I asked.
Last edited by Fast92RS; 03-12-2008 at 08:25 AM.
|
|
|
03-12-2008, 05:16 PM
|
#8
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 929
|
ok well it was driven without fluid for about 20 miles for one day. I realized it had no fluid when it started whining...so is it worth it to rebuild it or find a decent one for cheap somewhere?
__________________
1986 IROC-Z - 305- .030 over, Voodoo cam, 113 vette heads, tpi, hedman torque steps, GMMG 3in catback, custom chip, t56, 3.27s 9 bolt, rest of the car is stock.
2011 Camaro - 2lt/rs red jewel tincoat, m6 - SOLD
2014 Camaro SS - bolt ons
1998 Jimmy - the beater
|
|
|
03-12-2008, 06:08 PM
|
#9
|
Mr Fantastic
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Milford NJ
Posts: 7,917
|
ford also had the Z-spec trans with a 2.95 first gear and like a .6x 5th and was rated at 330ft/lbs...and i can vouch that they can take a beating
if youre set on a T5, a World Class should be fine for what you have listed in your sig...next step up is a TKO or T56, or an aftermarket T5 like Gforce
__________________
Matt
B18B1 FTW
Last edited by GP99GT; 03-12-2008 at 06:09 PM.
|
|
|
03-19-2008, 08:55 AM
|
#10
|
13 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Clifton,NJ/ Providence,RI
Posts: 520
|
The biggest problem with the T5 is the case itself.. under load when it tweaks or cracks is when things go wrong...if you need a trans spending around $500 on a used t5 in good shape is a deal..spending any more then that to have it rebuilt you would be better off saving for a tko or gforce.
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 10:56 PM
|
#11
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 929
|
thanks for the help im probably just going to use and abuse my old t5 til it grenades. i doubt it will tho cause i only have a 305 and mainly street use no hardcore track use so it should be ok til i can get a tko or a 6-spd
__________________
1986 IROC-Z - 305- .030 over, Voodoo cam, 113 vette heads, tpi, hedman torque steps, GMMG 3in catback, custom chip, t56, 3.27s 9 bolt, rest of the car is stock.
2011 Camaro - 2lt/rs red jewel tincoat, m6 - SOLD
2014 Camaro SS - bolt ons
1998 Jimmy - the beater
|
|
|
03-30-2008, 09:37 PM
|
#12
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 929
|
update, i took it to my trans guy the other day, he took it apart in front of me showed me what was wrong, not much btw, and ill have it back tomorrow. He said 1st and 2nd have some wear and hot spots on the gears and will whine but he said the rest is good so if i can live with the whining it will be ok. so for now ill have a 'blower' at low speed haha
__________________
1986 IROC-Z - 305- .030 over, Voodoo cam, 113 vette heads, tpi, hedman torque steps, GMMG 3in catback, custom chip, t56, 3.27s 9 bolt, rest of the car is stock.
2011 Camaro - 2lt/rs red jewel tincoat, m6 - SOLD
2014 Camaro SS - bolt ons
1998 Jimmy - the beater
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|