 |
|
05-17-2007, 06:30 PM
|
#126
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,623
|
he knows james(12secv6) too...But like I said...I'm not trying to be foolishly calling out people. But I'll race Kasey or any who wants to race, not because I think I'll win, I just like racing
__________________
2000 Tahoe Z71 5.7
1982 Z28 Pacecar 305
1999 S10 
Last edited by bubba428; 05-17-2007 at 06:31 PM.
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 06:53 PM
|
#127
|
|
Stalker
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,082
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by black34v6
blah blah blah blah
<twirls finger> i think all of you guys are gonna be pretty surprised at the difference in his car once Bubba is done. However it wont matter. because you are all bigoted towards v6 engines, or rather the 3.4 in general, you will give Bubba and anyone else with a 3.4 **** because you think its justified. <shrugs> typical v8 behavior.
|
honestly, you are not making any friends here. and IMO you opening your mouth is just making it harder for bubba. When he began the project, he was catching some slack, yes, but now that you, being all high and mighty, feel the need to group us all as having "typical v8 behavior", more people will be ragging on him. you are like lethalrides all over again. or you can plan to build a "1000hp t56 street car"... talk all you want. Try as you might, you will not earn any respect here. You can flaunt your fancy 3.4 till your little hearts content, but it dont mean crap to me, nor 99.9% of the people here. You actually make me laugh, like i could stop reading this thread and ignore it, but i need my daily amusement. plus cbrmikes comments are always entertaining. i'm just gonna keep at it until this thread gets locked, which will be soon. typical cali v6'er. lol
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 07:06 PM
|
#128
|
|
Mr Fantastic
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Milford NJ
Posts: 7,917
|
ive had 3 cars with V6's...my first was a 91 blazer with a 90* 4.3, had some balls.
2nd was my GPGT, N/A 3.8, 90*...also was pretty ballsy for a v6.
3rd is the current 3.1 60* lumina i have now...and...im not impressed.
summary: 90 degree v6 FTW, 60 degree FTL
__________________
Matt
B18B1 FTW
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 07:07 PM
|
#129
|
|
10 Second Club; Has fan club
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Delmont nj
Posts: 4,369
|
well, it is a Lumina... theyre only good for being a beater car and making it to south meets 
__________________
01' Z06 62k miles. Vararam, Longtubes, off road xpipe, tuned by me. Times TBA
2001 Corvette, Bolt ons , tuned 10.75@124.56 mph 1.38 60' Sold
1997 Saturn Sc1 5spd DOHC swapped
Bolt ons, decked head, stock intake cam on exhaust side, lotsa weight redux
13.22@102.32 mph 1.93 60'
12's on moda? One day
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 07:10 PM
|
#130
|
|
Mr Fantastic
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Milford NJ
Posts: 7,917
|
i havent driven it to a south meet, so we'll see about that one
__________________
Matt
B18B1 FTW
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 07:11 PM
|
#131
|
|
10 Second Club; Has fan club
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Delmont nj
Posts: 4,369
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GP99GT
i havent driven it to a south meet, so we'll see about that one
|
somebody else on the board has my friend
__________________
01' Z06 62k miles. Vararam, Longtubes, off road xpipe, tuned by me. Times TBA
2001 Corvette, Bolt ons , tuned 10.75@124.56 mph 1.38 60' Sold
1997 Saturn Sc1 5spd DOHC swapped
Bolt ons, decked head, stock intake cam on exhaust side, lotsa weight redux
13.22@102.32 mph 1.93 60'
12's on moda? One day
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 07:12 PM
|
#132
|
|
Mr Fantastic
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Milford NJ
Posts: 7,917
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 98tadriver
somebody else on the board has my friend
|
not from north jersey though...thats a hike
__________________
Matt
B18B1 FTW
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 07:15 PM
|
#133
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,623
|
the short apears at every one....
__________________
2000 Tahoe Z71 5.7
1982 Z28 Pacecar 305
1999 S10
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 07:20 PM
|
#134
|
|
Stalker
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,082
|
lmao.. ok honestly russell, how do you get banned from LS1tech????
and i loved this post....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Black34V6
the numbers in teh sig are wrong, i havent updated the sig in a bit -- i have 185 rwhp / 212 rwtq. i havent taken the car to the track lately.
the 16.069 @ 84 mph, yes, was after most of the mods. i suxx0r @ 1/4 mile driving. before i did some of my upgrades, i had a 16.3 @ 83 mph, and a 16.5 @ 84 mph (notice what im saying about how i cant drive at the track?)
anyhow. i expect if i can tune/get a good run - to be in the mid / low 14s for now, and better pretty soon.
again. im not out to be as fast as i possibly can. im just workin with what i got.
|
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showth...83#post5245483
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 07:39 PM
|
#135
|
|
BadMod
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: hamilton, nj
Posts: 8,889
|
lol...
i had my 3.4 i ran my 17.0s....i sold it and bought the ta for the SAME price, now i get better gas mileage, and run low 12s on a stock motor....
so everytime someone tells me they want to keep the v6 because the car was cheaper or its better on gas... i know for a fact...its wrong.
and the other argument where you say "i like being different"......theres a reason its different, NO ONE WANTS TO DO IT. and remember, transvestites are different too
__________________
So much stupid, so little time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 79CamaroDiva
It started before I drove your car. I just have to look at it the wrong way and your car poops parts.
|
Mercerville MotorSports, LLC
Last edited by Mike; 05-17-2007 at 07:43 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 07:41 PM
|
#136
|
|
BadMod
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: hamilton, nj
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokingSS
plus cbrmikes comments are always entertaining.
|
 thank you sir
__________________
So much stupid, so little time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 79CamaroDiva
It started before I drove your car. I just have to look at it the wrong way and your car poops parts.
|
Mercerville MotorSports, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 07:49 PM
|
#137
|
|
Mr Fantastic
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Milford NJ
Posts: 7,917
|
so anyway...90 > 60
drop a 3.8 in that thing if you wanna play with a v6
__________________
Matt
B18B1 FTW
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 08:13 PM
|
#138
|
|
Mr Fantastic
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Milford NJ
Posts: 7,917
|
__________________
Matt
B18B1 FTW
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 08:21 PM
|
#139
|
|
Resident Camera Guy
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 10,971
|
Used Car Blue Book Private Party:
Base Coupe / Z28 Coupe
$4,165.00 / $4,895.00
V6 3.4 Liter / V8 5.7 Liter
Automatic / 6 Speed Manual
19 mpg City / 17 mpg City
28 mpg Hwy / 26 mpg Hwy
The difference isn't that big.
__________________
Last edited by ar0ck; 05-17-2007 at 08:22 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 08:22 PM
|
#140
|
|
BadMod
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: hamilton, nj
Posts: 8,889
|
welcome alex
__________________
So much stupid, so little time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 79CamaroDiva
It started before I drove your car. I just have to look at it the wrong way and your car poops parts.
|
Mercerville MotorSports, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 08:23 PM
|
#141
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston/North
Posts: 9,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TransAm4Life
Used Car Blue Book Private Party:
Base Coupe / Z28 Coupe
$4,165.00 / $4,895.00
V6 3.4 Liter / V8 5.7 Liter
Automatic / 6 Speed Manual
19 mpg City / 17 mpg City
28 mpg Hwy / 26 mpg Hwy
The difference isn't that big.
|
i got 4,012 from the insurance co for mine 
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen
dumbass.
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 08:30 PM
|
#142
|
|
Resident Camera Guy
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 10,971
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbrrmike
welcome alex
|
I couldn't watch anymore of this v8 slander so I had to add.
But for the record I will not use my own car to compare. My cost to performance ratio went down the drain along time ago.
__________________
Last edited by ar0ck; 05-17-2007 at 08:31 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 08:50 PM
|
#143
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,623
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TransAm4Life
I couldn't watch anymore of this v8 slander so I had to add.
But for the record I will not use my own car to compare. My cost to performance ratio went down the drain along time ago.
|
DON'T LOOK AT ME!!!!!....I'm just just trying to save my thread from getting locked....I'm not calling out anyone....
__________________
2000 Tahoe Z71 5.7
1982 Z28 Pacecar 305
1999 S10
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 09:02 PM
|
#144
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Galloway, NJ
Posts: 3,964
|
Whoa guys wtf is going on here, listen, if you dont have anyting nice to say, then dont say it ok, this thread was to be about his progress about his car, not trash talkign a hobby he has. if you dont like V6's well then thats your thing, but some do, so stop. Bubba, stop sayign numbers and such, nothings true till its shownb on the slip. to be honest, I doubt youll run a 14 wiht that rear, and setup. so if your going to post on this thread, just talk about what youve done to your engine/car, not what its going to do after it gets done, if it does.black, Im sorry about the rowdiness goign on on this thread, were actually a bunch of cool guys, its jsut that when you start smack talking with a car thats barely been workedo n, and bubba , sorry it is true, your smack talking, your bragging, stop it, cause thats whats makign the V8 guys attack us, were not that bad.
__________________
1996 Camaro C/S - 2/3 Corvette Engine
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28
Uh yeah, after they surprized buttsecks us at Pearl Harbor?
|
Last edited by Blacdout96; 05-17-2007 at 09:03 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 09:08 PM
|
#145
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,623
|
well you do know the 94-95 F-body T-5 has a 3.75 1st gear, so even with a 3.42 i'm got a lot of ummph off the line...I have tried to be clear that the numbers I came up with were just rough estimates. Not trying to be bench racing just giving a general idea
__________________
2000 Tahoe Z71 5.7
1982 Z28 Pacecar 305
1999 S10
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 09:09 PM
|
#146
|
|
BadMod
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: hamilton, nj
Posts: 8,889
|
blacdout, kasey, craig, james, and im sure im forgeting some are NOT bad at all.
ive said at least 5 times in this thread i dont hate v6s or peoples projects, i hate people that claim numbers that cant be proven, i hate people that say that they can be as fast for cheaper *when they mean " as fast as a stock one"*
and i hate cocky pos people
__________________
So much stupid, so little time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 79CamaroDiva
It started before I drove your car. I just have to look at it the wrong way and your car poops parts.
|
Mercerville MotorSports, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 09:10 PM
|
#147
|
|
BadMod
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: hamilton, nj
Posts: 8,889
|
you fantabulous 1st gear wont do anything once you shift out of it
just stop talking, make a new progress thread in a tech section, only update it when you actually make some and no one will say anything
__________________
So much stupid, so little time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 79CamaroDiva
It started before I drove your car. I just have to look at it the wrong way and your car poops parts.
|
Mercerville MotorSports, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 09:18 PM
|
#148
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,623
|
I wasn't trying to start all this....It was going fine for a while...I'm not trying to be cocky or W/E you want to call it...i'm not running any major power adders so I'm not expecting much for the first runs...but when the computer is in well see what happens...for now I don't know
__________________
2000 Tahoe Z71 5.7
1982 Z28 Pacecar 305
1999 S10
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 09:22 PM
|
#149
|
|
Co-Founder / Site Admin
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,476
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bubba428
well you do know the 94-95 F-body T-5 has a 3.75 1st gear, so even with a 3.42 i'm got a lot of ummph off the line...
|
Not just those.....93-02 F-body M5s have the same gearing....
- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 09:49 PM
|
#150
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,623
|
accually the the 94-95 IS different. The tag number is 1352-245 the 96+ is 1352-247. different gears...and heres my source http://www.5speeds.com/t5/
__________________
2000 Tahoe Z71 5.7
1982 Z28 Pacecar 305
1999 S10
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
