|
08-27-2012, 10:20 AM
|
#1
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Warren, NJ
Posts: 332
|
Which intake manifold for a 350 swap.
Hi, I am looking at swapping a GM Goodwrench 350 longblock p/n 10076353 into my 84 T/A to replace the stock 305 (LG4).
I plan on reusing my stock ccQ-Jet, aircleaner & factory cowl induction, and EGR setup.
My LG4 intake was warped in the past and the water neck bolts have been helicoiled, so it would be best to go for a new intake.
I plan on running a fairly mild set up so I am just looking for something that can directly replace my LG4 intake and keep the stock hood clearances.
I am looking at the GMPP ZZ4 (#10185063) intake manifold and the Edelbrock Performer (#3701). Will these two give the me OEM clearances i am looking for?
Thanks for any assistance.
Last edited by TAdan; 08-27-2012 at 02:15 PM.
|
|
|
08-27-2012, 01:58 PM
|
#2
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 143
|
It has been a LONG while since since I had my 87 bird but when I swapped a 350 in and wanted to keep the stock hood I used a Wieand Stealth manifold with edelbrock carb and topped it with a edelbrock pro-flo air cleaner otherwise it wouldn't clear. I like the stealth because at the time my mild 350 was running a 272 cam, flat top pistons and a 64c head and the rpm power range was low.
This is just my opinion of course and it was a long time ago there maybe better options now.
|
|
|
08-27-2012, 02:15 PM
|
#3
|
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
|
Gmpps manifolds are made by edelbrock iirc, just with a bowtie casting mark.
|
|
|
08-27-2012, 02:40 PM
|
#4
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Warren, NJ
Posts: 332
|
Well I asked this question on Edelbrocks Facebook page and received the following reply:
"If there is any difference in height it will be minimal within 1/4"."
So I think I should be OK going with the Performer...
Unfortunately I only have about 1/4-1/2" to play with before my aircleaner will hit my the bottom of my Strut tower bar... So I guess I'll still need to track down those dimensions. D'oh!
Last edited by TAdan; 08-27-2012 at 02:45 PM.
|
|
|
08-27-2012, 10:12 PM
|
#5
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Stillwater
Posts: 822
|
I never had any issues running any performer/torquer manifolds on 3rd gens. Only issues I ran into was with air gaps and single planes like the victor jr.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LTb1ow
...its cool to like diesels, cause that and pretending to be country is like, hip nowadays!!
|
|
|
|
08-28-2012, 12:29 AM
|
#6
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: north jersey
Posts: 1,680
|
If its a minimal amount, would it hurt to shave the bottom of the strut tower to give you a hair of room if need be. Or shim where the bar mounts with a washer
Last edited by Lt1_8U; 08-28-2012 at 12:30 AM.
|
|
|
08-28-2012, 08:20 AM
|
#7
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Warren, NJ
Posts: 332
|
Thanks for the feedback everyone, I think I'll go with an OEM LG4 or L69 manifold rather than risk any interference. The STB just makes such a nice difference in handling that I'd hate to have to get rid of it.
LT1 8U, the STB has already been trimmed a bit to clear the air cleaner and if I went any higher it would be hitting the hood.
Last edited by TAdan; 08-28-2012 at 08:21 AM.
|
|
|
08-28-2012, 08:25 AM
|
#8
|
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
|
I take it that you are using a drop base air cleaner already?
|
|
|
08-28-2012, 08:51 AM
|
#9
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Warren, NJ
Posts: 332
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildBillyT
I take it that you are using a drop base air cleaner already?
|
I am currently using the stock aircleaner. A drop base aircleaner would solve my problem... but, since i'm nuts I'll be keeping the stock factory aircleaner as I like the original look.
Last edited by TAdan; 08-28-2012 at 08:53 AM.
|
|
|
08-28-2012, 08:53 AM
|
#10
|
Ayatollah of Rock N Rolla / Admin
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 12,573
|
Get the aftermarket intake and mill the carb pad if it's too much?
|
|
|
08-29-2012, 06:17 PM
|
#11
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Bridgewater, NJ
Posts: 835
|
Performer should fit - had one on my camaro until i went with the RPM version (with a taller hood).
__________________
1984 Camaro: 350 Auto, Global West Suspension, Baer Brakes, CTW Wheels
1989 GTA: Bolt-on L98. Global West Suspension, full Magnaflow exhaust, Wilwood Brakes, CTW Wheels
|
|
|
08-30-2012, 08:17 AM
|
#12
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Warren, NJ
Posts: 332
|
I e-mailed both Edelbrock and Summitt about their intakes. According to Edelbrock the Performer should be within 1/4" of an inch of the stock intake manifold height. Summitt says that their SUM-226008 is exactly the same dimensions as OEM, so I think I'll give the Summit intake a try. Thanks for all the feedback everyone.
Last edited by TAdan; 08-30-2012 at 08:18 AM.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|