Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Community Forums > Lounge

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-12-2006, 07:35 PM   #76
Tsar
MIR
 
Tsar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,692
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28
Yes I have, but I have sat in a Mustang, and I have sat in a 4th gen. 4th gens sit waaaaay too low, the dash is at eye level, and matches the very long hood. The rear hatch glass distorts rear view vision as well as big blind spots.
This is all ok and acceptable for a sports car, not ok for someone who wants a sporty car, but not someone who wants a sporty Pony car. Thirdgen started the low seating, 4th gens made it worse with a lower raked windshield
i like the low seating thing, if it wasnt for that i would feel like i was driving an SUV. as far as blind spots go...ehh u get used to them, you can always turn your head and look.
Tsar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2006, 09:25 PM   #77
BonzoHansen
Admin.
 
BonzoHansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 20,165
iTrader: (27)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tsar
i like the low seating thing, if it wasnt for that i would feel like i was driving an SUV. as far as blind spots go...ehh u get used to them, you can always turn your head and look.
It is the too low, waaaaayyy too big doors, dopey hatch window and too long nose that turned off most female buyers. GM effectively killed 1/2 the target market. That is one big reason why otherwise lesser Mustangs outsold 4th gens, and never stopped being made.

This would sit well with me:

*Base V6 + A4/M5, live axle, available 5.3L + a6/m6; 16"std/17" opt wheels
*SS gets LSx & live axle a6/m6. Big brakes , 17" std/18" optional
*Z28 gets LSx and IRS. m6 only. Big brakes, 18" hoops std.
*HYBRID OPTION!!!!!! Snap!

They can screw around with RS options too, if they must. That should have nothing to do with engine/trans - RS = trim option. Stripper available on request (no AC, PL, PW, radio, etc).

Any word on a rag top? Or dumb old t-tops?
__________________
Vent Windows Forever!

The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand. Or so I have read.

Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold. I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors.

Hey everybody, it's good to have you on the Baba-too-da-ba-too-ba-ba-buh-doo-ga-ga-bop-a-dop
BonzoHansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2006, 12:30 AM   #78
qwikz28
13 Second Club / Moderator
 
qwikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,694
iTrader: (6)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen
It is the too low, waaaaayyy too big doors, dopey hatch window and too long nose that turned off most female buyers. GM effectively killed 1/2 the target market. That is one big reason why otherwise lesser Mustangs outsold 4th gens, and never stopped being made.

This would sit well with me:

*Base V6 + A4/M5, live axle, available 5.3L + a6/m6; 16"std/17" opt wheels
*SS gets LSx & live axle a6/m6. Big brakes , 17" std/18" optional
*Z28 gets LSx and IRS. m6 only. Big brakes, 18" hoops std.
*HYBRID OPTION!!!!!! Snap!

They can screw around with RS options too, if they must. That should have nothing to do with engine/trans - RS = trim option. Stripper available on request (no AC, PL, PW, radio, etc).

Any word on a rag top? Or dumb old t-tops?
im with you 100%... only i'm all t-topped out. i want a ragtop
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow View Post
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
qwikz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2006, 11:15 AM   #79
BigAls87Z28
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
iTrader: (3)
All cars will come with either a 5spd or 6spd auto, and all with a 6spd manual.
All cars will have IRS. Too expensive to build in a live rear axle set up off a chassis designed for IRS.
I highly doubt that there will be a stripper option with no power windows, locks, ac as this will be engineerd into the car prior because the Camaro will share the chassis and subcomponents. It would cost more to engineer manual windows and door locks, as well as a cut off system for the AC into the car.
The ttop question was the first to come up at Detroit, and when we saw the roof top, we said it lookd very similar to the Corvette. If its very narrow in profile, It could be just a targa top style roof. What I brought up to one guy is that maybe the back seat can fold down and the top could latch into the back seat, like the Avalanch has with the window that pops into the seats. I just dont know if the back seat is big enough for the roof pannel.
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped
BigAls87Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2006, 01:45 PM   #80
BonzoHansen
Admin.
 
BonzoHansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 20,165
iTrader: (27)
I am under the impression the IRS is a 'bolt-in' sub-assembly. If so, they could do a bolt in live axle setup, which would be cheaper to build than the IRS. I won't believe they can do an IRS and complete on a cost basis until I see it with my own eyes.
__________________
Vent Windows Forever!

The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand. Or so I have read.

Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold. I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors.

Hey everybody, it's good to have you on the Baba-too-da-ba-too-ba-ba-buh-doo-ga-ga-bop-a-dop
BonzoHansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2006, 02:33 PM   #81
qwikz28
13 Second Club / Moderator
 
qwikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,694
iTrader: (6)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen
I am under the impression the IRS is a 'bolt-in' sub-assembly. If so, they could do a bolt in live axle setup, which would be cheaper to build than the IRS. I won't believe they can do an IRS and complete on a cost basis until I see it with my own eyes.
thunder racing did a live rear with the CTS-V... its only time that someone does it with camaro. rag-top is a definate right?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow View Post
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
qwikz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2006, 06:13 PM   #82
BigAls87Z28
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
iTrader: (3)
Then can because evey car off that chassis will have it. Economies of scale FTW. It would be more expensive to design, engineer, test, and certify a "bolt in" rear end that GM has to green light and warranty 100%, which would only make it more expensive.
Ford, on the otherhand, took an already paid for chassis, and ripped it apart, stripping everything. The cost savings per car for teh Mustang is about 300 dollars. The Camaro will come in at the right price point. Look at the LX cars. Full independent suspension front and rear, V6 and V8 engines, high tech gadgets....and they start at 23k.
It can be done, adn will be.
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped
BigAls87Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2006, 10:48 AM   #83
Tru2Chevy
Co-Founder / Site Admin
 
Tru2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,476
iTrader: (8)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by qwikz28
thunder racing did a live rear with the CTS-V... its only time that someone does it with camaro. rag-top is a definate right?
Well, Madman did it, and Thunder is selling it....

And Al, going back to page 3....I have driven 4th gens and SN-95 Mustangs, and 4th FTW when it comes to ergonomics. Visibility is better (even with the top down on Kare's car), I can actually climb in and out of a 4th gen without smacking my leg on the steering wheel, mustang door handle is hidden behind my knee, and the lower seat bolsters in the Mustang dig into the side of my leg and are kind of a pain on long trips.

Maybe things are different for little people, but not for anyone over 6'

- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?

Tru2Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2006, 11:06 AM   #84
BonzoHansen
Admin.
 
BonzoHansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 20,165
iTrader: (27)
'Stangs are tight for normal sized people.
__________________
Vent Windows Forever!

The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand. Or so I have read.

Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold. I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors.

Hey everybody, it's good to have you on the Baba-too-da-ba-too-ba-ba-buh-doo-ga-ga-bop-a-dop
BonzoHansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2006, 11:19 AM   #85
BigAls87Z28
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
iTrader: (3)
Im 6'1, and have sat in several. Ive also sat in several Fbodies, but guess who matters when it comes to the mass-produced cars.
Women. Not all women, but most girls who get them for high school and such liek the Mustang because its someone easy to drive. Fbody...its tough.
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped
BigAls87Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2006, 11:30 AM   #86
Tru2Chevy
Co-Founder / Site Admin
 
Tru2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 22,476
iTrader: (8)
Social Networks:

Yea, I know. Kare fits fine in her car, and the only visibility issue she has is with the hood scoop blocking a bit of her vision over the right front. I on the otherhand, can't see crap out of her car. But she's 5'4", and I'm 6'4".....

- Justin
__________________
1999 Camry - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee - Not running / Project / Selling?

Tru2Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2006, 10:15 PM   #87
NLinnear
 
NLinnear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bergenfield NJ
Posts: 353
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by qwikz28
thunder racing did a live rear with the CTS-V... its only time that someone does it with camaro. rag-top is a definate right?
If I am looking at the same thing, Madman and TR designed and built an IRS unit, not a solid rear.
NLinnear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2006, 10:26 PM   #88
qwikz28
13 Second Club / Moderator
 
qwikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,694
iTrader: (6)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by NLinnear
If I am looking at the same thing, Madman and TR designed and built an IRS unit, not a solid rear.
yeah... madman did the IRS unit out of a ford 9". someone else did a solid rear swap and i thought it was thunder racing but it wasnt.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow View Post
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
qwikz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Community Forums > Lounge


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.