Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
Go Back   NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Community Forums > Lounge

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-02-2014, 06:10 AM   #1
KevinW
 
KevinW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Millstone twp
Posts: 541
iTrader: (1)
92 or 93-97 Comparision

Hey all, been looking at the 3rd gens 90-92 and have not found one that meets what I am looking for (stock, auto, hardtop, not beat). I have started looking at the early 4th gens 93-97. So between the two gens, which one is easier to fix? Pros and cons of either? The pass side air bag is a plus on the 4th, but that motor being recessed under the windshield looks tougher to work on (I cannot even see the distributor!). Are parts availability for the 4th gens as good as the 3rd gens? thx
KevinW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2014, 07:15 AM   #2
sweetbmxrider
Meet Coordinator
 
sweetbmxrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: brick/pt. pleasant beach
Posts: 19,368
iTrader: (12)
3.4's and 3.8's have coil packs. My 3.4 was very reliable but I think the 3.8 is a better platform from what I've read.
__________________
sweetbmxrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2014, 08:26 AM   #3
KevinW
 
KevinW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Millstone twp
Posts: 541
iTrader: (1)
Ah, I get it! I have a 3.8 in my Impala, nice engine. Hmm, just more to think about thx
KevinW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2014, 08:34 AM   #4
1320B4U
 
1320B4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: West Milford
Posts: 1,026
iTrader: (0)
4th gens had a better ride quality and fit/finish was better than the 3rd gens. 2nd airbag and things like abs are perks. For an everyday driver, I'd vote 4th gen.
__________________
<img src=http://i678.photobucket.com/albums/vv143/B1320B4U/both-1.jpg border=0 alt= />

1991 Camaro
1992 L98/ttop Firehawk tribute (sold)
2006 Srt-10 Viper
2012 z-71
2011 Equinox (family vehicle)
1320B4U is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2014, 02:50 PM   #5
ThoR294
^^^Lover of bad cars^^^ Meet Coordinator
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Whitehouse Station
Posts: 2,271
iTrader: (1)
4th gen
__________________
1986 Honda VFR750 - 89.3HP to the wheel
2000 Trans Am M6 - Mods: Yes.
2026 Tesla Model Y - lol
ThoR294 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2014, 02:55 PM   #6
BonzoHansen
Admin.
 
BonzoHansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 20,165
iTrader: (27)
kevin she might want to drive both. I know one of the downfalls of the 4th gen was women did not like it. I know of at least two women who drove 3rd and 4ths and did not like the 4ths. both mentioned visibility (I can't see the nose) issues.
__________________
Vent Windows Forever!

The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand. Or so I have read.

Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold. I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors.

Hey everybody, it's good to have you on the Baba-too-da-ba-too-ba-ba-buh-doo-ga-ga-bop-a-dop
BonzoHansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2014, 03:16 PM   #7
redsoxsstink
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: milltown
Posts: 1,497
iTrader: (2)
Social Networks:

i have both, i prefer my 4th gen for a daily driver. less rattles and squeaks, it is better refined for DD duty. nothing is wrong with the 3rd gen, i just find the 4th gen to be more comfortable.

as a note the 97 was the only car with that earlier body style to receive the 3.8l, everything else got the 3.4. it is also OBDII
__________________
2002 Camaro Sunset Orange Mettalic, V6, 5spd, bilstein HD shocks and struts, eibach pro lowering kit, eibach f/r sway bars, lakewood PHB, UMI 2 point subframe connectors, energy suspensions poly master bushing kit
daily econobox and first car

1986 IROC-Z, T56, MGW shifter, Heads, Cam, Holley Stealth Ram 350, t-top, tubular LCA with relo brackets, adjustable PHB, belltech sway bars, ground control weight jacks, SLP mid length headers, 3in w/borla XR1, RIP 3 10 bolts, 12.7 @ 109 so far.. atleast its faster than stock SOLD

1971 Camaro LS3/T56/9in, cam only and still carbed, RIP 2 10 bolts, 11.62@121

03 Blazer 2 door - salt sponge

Last edited by redsoxsstink; 06-02-2014 at 03:17 PM.
redsoxsstink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2014, 03:48 PM   #8
maroman88
12 Second Club
 
maroman88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Milford
Posts: 8,373
iTrader: (11)
3.8 was introduced in the fbody in 95, along with the 3.4, 96+ was all 3.8 for the v6 option
__________________
88 Camaro
95 Impala SS
97 Trans Am WS6
98 Blazer ZR2
00 Corvette
04 CTS-V
04 Grand Cherokee
06 GMC Sierra
07 Sublime Charger Daytona
12 Tahoe LT
17 Malibu LT
maroman88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 01:57 PM   #9
wrong generation
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: forked river nj
Posts: 609
iTrader: (7)
Social Networks:

after owning several 3rd and several 4th gens. i can honestly say my vote goes for 3rd gens any day of the week over 4th gens. 3rd gens look better and are so much easier to work on.
wrong generation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 03:39 PM   #10
KevinW
 
KevinW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Millstone twp
Posts: 541
iTrader: (1)
Ease of working on it is a major factor! Looking at a purple 92 and hope to see it in person soon (2 hr trip!) . Looks all there and unmodified, just needs paint work and some interior seat/dash re freshening. But pics can be deceiving! I am also going to look at a 93 nearby too. thx!
KevinW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2014, 08:54 AM   #11
ThoR294
^^^Lover of bad cars^^^ Meet Coordinator
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Whitehouse Station
Posts: 2,271
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by maroman88 View Post
3.8 was introduced in the fbody in 95, along with the 3.4, 96+ was all 3.8 for the v6 option
correct
__________________
1986 Honda VFR750 - 89.3HP to the wheel
2000 Trans Am M6 - Mods: Yes.
2026 Tesla Model Y - lol
ThoR294 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2014, 09:30 AM   #12
NastyEllEssWon
 
NastyEllEssWon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Delran
Posts: 6,785
iTrader: (11)
its funny that someone mentioned the hood issue. one of my favorite parts of driving a third gen over a fourth gen was seeing the hood stretch out in front of the windshield. especially if you have a nice hood
NastyEllEssWon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2014, 10:34 AM   #13
KevinW
 
KevinW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Millstone twp
Posts: 541
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
kevin she might want to drive both. I know one of the downfalls of the 4th gen was women did not like it. I know of at least two women who drove 3rd and 4ths and did not like the 4ths. both mentioned visibility (I can't see the nose) issues.
Scott, she is still 15 I am trying to get her to help me fix it up before she get her license, so that I can teach her car mechanics at the same time as instilling a pride of ownership that I hope translates to her being more careful driving it! Of course when we get something I will be be teaching her on spins around the neighborhood She is still set on the 3rd gen from a visual standpoint only, she likes the purple! She wants a red car, but I am putting my foot down on that, nothing like a new driver in a red Camaro getting unwanted attention!
KevinW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2014, 11:12 AM   #14
1320B4U
 
1320B4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: West Milford
Posts: 1,026
iTrader: (0)
^ Good move on instilling pride in a vehicle by fixing it up(..and not running out and leasing a new car for a new driver). Got my first 3rd gen when I was 15 too.
__________________
<img src=http://i678.photobucket.com/albums/vv143/B1320B4U/both-1.jpg border=0 alt= />

1991 Camaro
1992 L98/ttop Firehawk tribute (sold)
2006 Srt-10 Viper
2012 z-71
2011 Equinox (family vehicle)
1320B4U is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2014, 08:54 PM   #15
V
Stalker
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,082
iTrader: (12)
yea, the 3.4 was around through 95 and standard in 96. The 3.8 was just for California emission compliance in 95.

Last edited by V; 06-07-2014 at 08:56 PM.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2014, 07:18 AM   #16
KevinW
 
KevinW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Millstone twp
Posts: 541
iTrader: (1)
Well, went and looked at the 93 that was close by. it is a contender, going to get a closer look during the week. It was a shore car, so the underside is pretty rusty. muffler and upper A-arms were really rusty. Going to have to get it on a lift to really see if there is any deep damage. Also looked at a buddys 3rd gen and it looks like a much bigger car, so we are going to focus the hunt on the 93-97 versions before the 4 rectangular headlights were phased out. The 92 owner never got back to me with contact info, oh well.
KevinW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2014, 05:57 AM   #17
KevinW
 
KevinW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Millstone twp
Posts: 541
iTrader: (1)
Well, the 93 did not work out, a lot of rust underneath and the gas/brake lines were rusty enough to have to change them out soon. But the real issue was my kid did not really fit in the camaro. In order for her to reach the pedals, she had to have the seat way forward which put her too close to the airbag and roof. And the owner whipped out a cigar and started smoking while we were talking. So 80K miles of cigar smoke did not do wonders for the electronics Now we are going to go look at random cars to see what she fits into.
KevinW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2014, 10:47 AM   #18
conlinj
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Rockledge
Posts: 64
iTrader: (1)
Ever think of a beretta? I had two and loved them.

-Jim
__________________
conlinj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2014, 07:50 PM   #19
1320B4U
 
1320B4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: West Milford
Posts: 1,026
iTrader: (0)
Just saw this posted...

http://newjersey.craigslist.org/cto/4526720249.html
__________________
<img src=http://i678.photobucket.com/albums/vv143/B1320B4U/both-1.jpg border=0 alt= />

1991 Camaro
1992 L98/ttop Firehawk tribute (sold)
2006 Srt-10 Viper
2012 z-71
2011 Equinox (family vehicle)
1320B4U is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 05:51 AM   #20
KevinW
 
KevinW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Millstone twp
Posts: 541
iTrader: (1)
The Baretta was a good thought, but she was not positive on the front end. Open to more suggestions, she likes 80s 2 door cars, flip headlights a plus! But we need to get her something with airbags, so an 80s look that carried on to the early 90s.

Last edited by KevinW; 06-19-2014 at 05:58 AM.
KevinW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 07:30 AM   #21
91chevyz28
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dumont
Posts: 231
iTrader: (0)
What about the 1998-2004 Grand Prix GTP 2 door.
91chevyz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 12:10 PM   #22
KevinW
 
KevinW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Millstone twp
Posts: 541
iTrader: (1)
Yes, I was thinking about Pontiacs if we did not find a chevy. I am going to try to see if she likes 2000-2005 Monte Carlo's, I think they may work.
KevinW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 06:17 PM   #23
KevinW
 
KevinW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Millstone twp
Posts: 541
iTrader: (1)
Monte is a no.
KevinW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 05:09 PM   #24
conlinj
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Rockledge
Posts: 64
iTrader: (1)
Lumina z34? if you can deal with the twin cam motor...
__________________
conlinj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2014, 06:30 AM   #25
KevinW
 
KevinW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Millstone twp
Posts: 541
iTrader: (1)
thx, we are going to look at 95 to 04 mustangs next
KevinW is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds > Community Forums > Lounge


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsor List














All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.