| 
| 
	| View Poll Results: Remove or keep the factory ground effects |  
	| Remove them |      | 18 | 47.37% |  
	| Keep them |      | 20 | 52.63% |  
	
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-31-2012, 11:54 AM | #26 |  
	| 
				 
                                        
				Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: West Milford 
					Posts: 1,026
				     
                                    
                                 | 
			
			Just look at every other black 4th gen w/out ground fx's and you'll get the picture.
 I always dug the cme on the 4th gens...thats why i made my exhaust exit out the middle of the 3rd gen...however it needs the side ground fx's imo to bring it all together.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-31-2012, 04:35 PM | #27 |  
	| Co-Founder / Site Admin 
				 
                                        
				Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Ewing, NJ 
					Posts: 22,476
				 | 
			
			Another vote for no GFX. I certainly don't think they look ricerish or anything, but I've never been a fan of the GFX on these cars. 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by The Fixer  If you use small black rubber plugs in the rocker panel holes to keep dirt/debris out, you wouldn't even notice them from more than a foot away since it's low, and already black. |  Great idea Steve!
 
 - Justin
		
				__________________1999 Camry  - Beigemobile DD
2002 Suburban  - Wife's DD
2004 Grand Cherokee  - Not running / Project / Selling?
   |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-01-2013, 12:29 AM | #28 |  
	| Resident Camera Guy   
				 
                                        
				Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: North Jersey 
					Posts: 10,971
				 | 
			
			I for one am not a fan of the ground effects, I don't think the flow properly with the car. Less to worry about. I second a CME.
		 
				__________________   |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-01-2013, 08:23 AM | #29 |  
	| 
				 
                                        
				Join Date: May 2009 Location: Highland Mills, NY 
					Posts: 1,915
				 | 
			
			I had no idea it was going to be this close
		 
				__________________ 2000 Camaro SS 610rwhp/570rwtq LS2 440, 12 bolt 3.73, tranzilla t56 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-01-2013, 11:39 AM | #30 |  
	| 
				 
                                        
				Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: North Jersey 
					Posts: 222
				     
                                    
                                 | 
			
			Keep em. Just fix em. Looks entirely better imho. Look at my Formula. It has ground effects. I'd never remove them, now that they're there.  Once you get em, you gotta keep em.
		 
				__________________2002 N.H.R.A. Edition. M6 Full SLP exhaust, heads, cam, intake,maf, k&n filter, Bilstein shocks, Eibach springs, to much to list
 1999 Z28 A4 upgraded brakes, cat back, computrr tune, Vette wheels. Bunch of little stuff
 1994. Z28 A4  Full exhaust including SLP Long tubes, 3" ORY pipe, 3 in cat back,  CAI, chip, maf,BMR  A Arms, Panhard rod, torque arm,. Bilstein shocks, Eibach springs, transmission more, including street shift kit.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-02-2013, 12:49 AM | #31 |  
	| 
				 
                                        
				Join Date: May 2007 Location: Jim Thorpe PA 
					Posts: 2,134
				     
                                    
                                 | 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by ar0ck  I for one am not a fan of the ground effects, I don't think the flow properly with the car. Less to worry about. I second a CME. |  I dont think the factory gfx would be that bad if the front gfx didnt look like an afterthought just tacked on the front. 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Mezzy  Keep em. Just fix em. Looks entirely better imho. Look at my Formula. It has ground effects. I'd never remove them, now that they're there.  Once you get em, you gotta keep em. |  The firebird/ta gfx flow much better with the lines of the car then the camaro gfx. The camaro ones almost look like big fangs or something.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-02-2013, 06:50 AM | #32 |  
	| Power Member/NJFBOA Bookie/Moderator 
				 
                                        
				Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: North Jersey = Best Jersey. 
					Posts: 4,435
				 | 
			
			I'm not a fan of Camaro GFX in pictures, but in person, they're not as dramatic as photography leads on. They're actually not bad, and MyFirstZ's car is tasteful/"clean" enough that it will still look good overall regardless of which direction he chooses to go. 
 Keep us in the loop. Sorry for not making this decision any easier!
 
				__________________  1995 Firebird... Stock-ish.
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by LS1ow  Good. He microwaved my phone 6 years ago, i hope his intake erupts. |  |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-02-2013, 07:18 AM | #33 |  
	| Meet Coordinator 
				 
                                        
				Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: brick/pt. pleasant beach 
					Posts: 19,370
				     
                                    
                                 | 
			
			The front kills it for me too.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-02-2013, 09:33 AM | #34 |  
	| 
				 
                                        
				Join Date: May 2009 Location: Highland Mills, NY 
					Posts: 1,915
				 | 
			
			I was leaning towards removal myself hence the thread. 
 But I'm going to remove the passenger side rocker this week to see how bad the holes and paint might be underneath it before it goes in for body work Monday. As long as it really didn't get damaged by that large piece of road debri, I'll probably remove them and put it in the basement for the season and see how I like it. The CME might wait for other reasons.
 
				__________________ 2000 Camaro SS 610rwhp/570rwtq LS2 440, 12 bolt 3.73, tranzilla t56
				 Last edited by MyFirstZ; 01-02-2013 at 09:34 AM.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-03-2013, 10:24 PM | #35 |  
	| 
				 
                                        
				Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Staten Island, NY 
					Posts: 252
				     
                                    
                                 | 
			
			Decide if you like the CME or GFX better and go that route.  Unfortunately, the stock GFX do not match up with the CME so you cannot have both....ask me how I know.
		 
				__________________2019 Satin Steel Metallic Cadillac Escalade ESV Sport
 2010 Radiant Silver Cadillac CTS Wagon
 2007 Blue Silverado Max LTZ CCSB 4x4
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2013, 10:43 AM | #36 |  
	| 
				 
                                        
				Join Date: May 2009 Location: Highland Mills, NY 
					Posts: 1,915
				 | 
			
			Lol well Monday I will talk cost with my buddies body shop and see how much I will have for cme
		 
				__________________ 2000 Camaro SS 610rwhp/570rwtq LS2 440, 12 bolt 3.73, tranzilla t56 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2013, 11:37 AM | #37 |  
	| BadMod 
				 
                                        
				Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: hamilton, nj 
					Posts: 8,889
				     
                                    
                                 | 
			
			If they mount the same as ta ones the holes are obvious and big. I can take pics if you want
		 
				__________________So much stupid, so little time. 
	Mercerville MotorSports, LLCQuote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by 79CamaroDiva  It started before I drove your car. I just have to look at it the wrong way and your car poops parts. |  |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2013, 05:24 PM | #38 |  
	| 
				 
                                        
				Join Date: May 2009 Location: Highland Mills, NY 
					Posts: 1,915
				 | 
			
			yeah please do. The one side will be coming off saturday night regardless because of damage but yeah pictures are appreciated .
		 
				__________________ 2000 Camaro SS 610rwhp/570rwtq LS2 440, 12 bolt 3.73, tranzilla t56 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-06-2013, 02:31 PM | #39 |  
	| 
				 
                                        
				Join Date: May 2009 Location: Highland Mills, NY 
					Posts: 1,915
				 | 
				__________________ 2000 Camaro SS 610rwhp/570rwtq LS2 440, 12 bolt 3.73, tranzilla t56 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-06-2013, 02:35 PM | #40 |  
	| 
				 
                                        
				Join Date: May 2009 Location: Highland Mills, NY 
					Posts: 1,915
				 | 
			
			needs to be lowered more lol
		 
				__________________ 2000 Camaro SS 610rwhp/570rwtq LS2 440, 12 bolt 3.73, tranzilla t56 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-06-2013, 08:25 PM | #41 |  
	| 12 Second Club 
				 
                                        
				Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: West Milford 
					Posts: 8,373
				     
                                    
                                 | 
			
			looks like errrrbody elses camaro without
		 
				__________________88 Camaro
 95 Impala SS
 97 Trans Am WS6
 98 Blazer ZR2
 00 Corvette
 04 CTS-V
 04 Grand Cherokee
 06 GMC Sierra
 07 Sublime Charger Daytona
 12 Tahoe LT
 17 Malibu LT
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 05:44 PM | #42 |  
	| 
				 
                                        
				Join Date: May 2009 Location: Highland Mills, NY 
					Posts: 1,915
				 | 
			
			well I dropped the car off today at the shop. 
 completely not thinking............the non gfx rocker that took some damage will be evaluated and added to the quote to be repaired. I actually forgot about that.
 
 So I have to wait until the adjuster comes down and for a call back before I see what else is going to get done.
 
				__________________ 2000 Camaro SS 610rwhp/570rwtq LS2 440, 12 bolt 3.73, tranzilla t56 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 07:05 PM | #43 |  
	| 
				 
                                        
				Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Morris County 
					Posts: 1,033
				     
                                    
                                 | 
			
			After looking at post 39. I say keepem fo sho..
		 
				__________________94 Trans am 25th anniversary
 86 Buick Regal T-type
 73 camaro 454/T56 work in progress.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-11-2013, 02:58 PM | #44 |  
	| 
				 
                                        
				Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Morris County, NJ 
					Posts: 538
				     
                                    
                                 | 
			
			definately keep them on. the car looks quite bland without them... they set off the rest of your tasteful appearance mods. like someone else said, it looks far too average without them on.
		 
				__________________355 & Supercharged ...    Another trip inside the acid bath..no salvation and the grave is coming fast.. |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
 
  
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  | 
 |  |