World's most valuable car brands.

[BonzoHansen]

Ha ha Al, you fell for Tsar's trolling.

[V]

well... actually the most prevalent vehicles in Afghanistan are toyotas(obviously) with several older BMWs rolling around. I dont think i saw ANY civilian owned american brand cars.

I did see one toyota with a Texas state inspection sticker on it though...

[Tsar]

Originally Posted by V

well... actually the most prevalent vehicles in Afghanistan are toyotas(obviously) with several older BMWs rolling around. I dont think i saw ANY civilian owned american brand cars.

I did see one toyota with a Texas state inspection sticker on it though...

You mean there are no 599's over there? Surely, you jest!

Originally Posted by SteveR

I'm a little surprised Porsche is #5. They also have Porsche, Audi, and WV listed separately. I know they all used to be the same company, when did that stop?

Simple, VW AG is not a trademark that people recognize when they buy a Porsche, Audi or VW. Yes, the money goes to VW, but Porsche trademark is a whole separate entity.

Originally Posted by BonzoHansen

Ha ha Al, you fell for Tsar's trolling.

I'll admit, when I made this thread it was for fun, mostly, and to see how Bi Gal would fly off his handle, again, and get his panties all twisted up. Now it is generally amusing, because he is clueless about trademarks and fails to see that certain trademarks might not be recognized everywhere.

For example the largest trademark in Russia is:



It's as well know as NY Yankees (their logo) in US. Easily recognizable, seen every where - yet, I bet without Googling and looking at the URL most people here would not have ANY idea what this trademark is, or what company it belongs to.



P.S. Bi Gal, take a midol. World needs dumb people too.

[Tsar]

Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28

And yes, GM cannot make it because GM does not make cars.

Google missed your memo.

[BigAls87Z28]

Im not upset, just trying to show how rediculious you look by posting **** like this.
He can troll, and get not a slap on the wrist, but when Matt makes a goofy comment, he gets banned? Scott, you yoursellf have called him a troll, yet no action taken.

Glad to see the "rules" in full effect.

[12secondv6]

ibtl

[enRo]

This thread went places.

[Tsar]

Actually every post I made about trademarks was accurate, you just got your panties all twisted up.

[BigAls87Z28]

Yeah, but the point of this post, and your other failed attempts at trying to stir **** up, is trolling.

Again, the link and your postings are ********. Yeah, trademarks are one thing, but how any of that has any bearing on anything in the automotive world, and why you would bring it as some sort of point to show that GM sucks, or that BMW is awesome, or whatever you did it for, is trolling.

[Tsar]

Oh there's no question that I posted it to mess with you, I needed a break from studying.

By the way, you said GM sucks, not me. I also didn't say BMW was awesome.

I'm sure this will be locked now... sadly.

[Mike]

this. is a trademark people, stop feeding into it and naming models.

and nick, how great can the ferrari trademark be, when a cheap pos exhaust company can damn near copy it.....

[Mike]

Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28

Im not upset, just trying to show how rediculious you look by posting **** like this.
He can troll, and get not a slap on the wrist, but when Matt makes a goofy comment, he gets banned? Scott, you yoursellf have called him a troll, yet no action taken.

Glad to see the "rules" in full effect.

trolling for reactions and trolling in the typical internet sense are different. this thread made sense until people started making up things that tsar never said.

[12secondv6]

Originally Posted by cbrrmike

this thread made sense until people started making up things

People.... we must stay on topic so here we go:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WNrx2jq184

[SteveR]

Originally Posted by 12secondv6

People.... we must stay on topic so here we go:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WNrx2jq184